Clarify what you mean.
Turn a vague idea, request, or problem into an explicit scope, with the questions the work must answer and the constraints it must respect.
Bring an idea, a problem, or a draft. Leave with a professional document, connected to your project, approved and ready for your team or your agents to build from.
The real challenge
AI made documents cheap. It did not make them right.
A draft that looks finished hides its gaps: a requirement nobody can test, a risk with no owner, a regulation nobody named. Those gaps surface later, in the build, where they cost the most.
Kryterea puts AI to work inside the standards your profession already uses, then asks a person to approve the result before it moves.
See how it worksWhat Kryterea does
Kryterea helps people in software and IT move from a rough request to a document their team and their agents can trust.
Turn a vague idea, request, or problem into an explicit scope, with the questions the work must answer and the constraints it must respect.
The preparation journey
A connected journey from an early idea to work worth building from.
Name the problem, goal, and measure of success.
Align the scope, constraints, needs, and assumptions.
Map the decisions, dependencies, risks, and milestones.
Keep evidence, requirements, reasoning, and decisions connected.
Test the work against a published standard and resolve the gaps.
Give people and agents a trusted basis to build from.
The workspace
A document is only as useful as the evidence and decisions behind it. Kryterea keeps both attached to the work, from the first question to the approved version your agents build from.
Who it is for
Kryterea meets the individual who writes the spec, gives teams one way to produce and approve it, and gives organisations the same standard everywhere.
I write the specs
Business analysts, product managers, and technical founders get documents built to the standard, with the reasoning and evidence kept visible.
I run a practice
Every contributor works to the same standard, and clients approve the exact version they signed, so review stops being a rewrite.
I run this across an organisation
Every team's documents meet the same standard before they ship, with the approvals, change history, and audit trail kept for you.
The difference is the basis
Most tools lose the reasoning when the document is exported. Kryterea keeps the claim, the source, the assumption, and the owner connected, so the version that reaches a reviewer or a coding agent can answer their questions.
Your agents build from what was approved, not from whatever was pasted last.
Migrating the intake process cuts handling time by 40% within two quarters.
You stay in command
Kryterea clarifies, drafts, and checks, then stops. Nothing with a consequence moves without your approval, and every change after that is tracked against the version you approved.
AI builds. You decide what gets built.
Common questions
A better place to begin
Bring the idea, the problem, or the draft you already have. Kryterea turns it into a document your team can approve and your agents can build from.
Coming soon. Join the waiting list.